Saturday, May 29, 2010

A New National Security Plan

Last week, the Obama administration released its first National Security Plan, and it largely comes as a rebuke of Bush administration security policies.

More importantly to the topic of this class, however, is the stark absence of any mention of the word "Islamic," in favor of, "violent extremism." It is yet another attempt by Obama to redefine the enemy the United States faces in the twenty first century, and it is an attempt to assuage diplomatic relations still reeling from the previous eight years. Yet, the new National Security Strategy does not attempt to define exactly what violent extremism is, either, and only acknowledge that the gravest threat would be for one of these extremists to obtain a weapon of mass destruction. This lack of definition does of course leave the United States open to pursue the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in a much broader manner than by specifically naming targets, but one wonders if "violent extremism," does disservice to the manner of the threat we are facing.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

A Driving Sense of Islamophobia

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/27/anti.ahmadinejad.ads/index.html?hpt=T2
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/27/new.york.islam.ads/index.html?hpt=Sbin

It comes as no surprise that the first two cities that have what can easily be deemed Islamophobic advertisements on city transportation come in the two cities that were the main targets of the September 11th attacks: New York and Washington, DC. Both these articles from cnn.com illustrate the fears of Islamic fundamentalists and the religion of violence, that have emerged since 9/11.

On WMATA buses around Washington DC, Ahmadinejad's likeness is pictured next to text reading "Iran makes a KILLING every day we wait" supposedly referencing our nation's dependence on foreign oil. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology issued a report recently that includes the fact that changes from the clean energy legislation currently in Congress would reduce Iran's income by approximately $100 million per day. That's the "KILLING" the ad claims to be referencing, but with the nature of the ad and the capitalization of "KILLING" the links to Ahmadinejad's desires to wipe Israel off the map and his supposed links to terrorism are what come to mind.

Similarly, in New York City, a new series of ads sponsored by Stop the Islamization of America (SIOA) target those individuals that want to, "stand up against the evil of Islamic jihadi terrorism and Islamic supremacism." These ads read "Fatwa on your head? Is your community or family threatening you? Leaving Islam?" Once again the "unintended" message is that Islam is a religion of violence.

I would imagine that the public outcry against such ads would be much different had it been a religion other than Islam that was targeted. I find it shocking and frankly appalling that these two cities even accepted the ads. It just goes to show what really drives us...money.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

The Few vs. the Many

I'm just in the middle of watching the PBS video about Saudi terrorist rehabilitation which Kelly recommended. One of Robert Lacey's comments really resonated with me - his remark that people remember the 15 Saudis who were involved in the events of 9/11, but will likely never consider the 15 million Saudis who "would never dream of" committing an act of terrorism. It made me think of this article, which details how an American college student was attacked while she was studying abroad in Amman. She describes how shortly following her ideal, a Bedouin man saw her and noticed her obviously visible bruises and injuries, and told her, "There are good men, and there are bad. In the whole world. This man, he was bad. But we, we are not all bad." This seems to be what people forget in their panic towards terrorism and fear of terrorist - that every country and society is host to both good and bad people.

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Doha Debates: Discussion of the Major Political Topics in the Middle East

Thank you to Maha Hilal for suggesting this link to the Doha Debates, founded in 2004 by the Qatar Foundation, chaired by former BBC correspondent, Tim Sebastian. 

Rehabilitation for Terrorists? Recommended PBS Video

This PBS Video on Saudi Arabia's rehabilitation program has been suggested by Kelly McCormack.  The program asks, "can terrorists be rehabilitated with kindness?"

"Sweet" 16

I know this comes a week after our discussion of the definition of terrorism, but the fact that it's going on today makes it applicable. In the first week's readings we learned that different federal government agencies have different definitions of "terror" and "terrorism" making it difficult to fight terrorism nationally, and even harder to construct an international definition that can be adhered to. This CNN article highlights the difficulty federal agencies have in not only defining terrorism, but in figuring out who is supposed to be in charge of the counter-terrorism efforts and what authority the Director of National Intelligence should have with regard to overseeing the 16 (yes SIXTEEN...just stop and read that again...16, SIXTEEN) intelligence agencies that report to the DNI.

With 16 agencies--each with a slightly different definition of terror and terrorism--being headed by one Congressionally-mandated position that has no real authority, it's no wonder Dennis Blair became so frustrated he resigned.

Though it's a cliche, too many chefs does indeed spoil the pot, and with sixteen intelligence agencies and one powerless Director, the pot might be dangerously close to boiling over.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

What if God was a Goddess?

Think of all the religions. Now take the male figure out and replace him with the Goddess. Quite a change, right? This idea struck me as I was reading Islam Under Siege by American University professor and author, Akbar Ahmed; somewhere around chapter two, What is Going Wrong?
I came across a description of the world we live in today by a scholar named Roland Barthes as “a moment of gentle apocalypse”. Then, I wondered if we would have the wars that are waged in the name of God as frequently as if they were in the name of a Goddess? It seems to me that the Goddess was predominating in planting cultures and it was the hunting nomadic cultures that have Gods. The connection with the Goddess and the planting cultures is connected with fertilization, feeding the crops, planting of the seeds and harvesting the crops. Just think how we refer to the Earth as “Mother Earth” all invoked through the mother image. If a tree or plant dies it goes back into the Earth and is reborn; you do not get this in the hunting cultures.
Just changing this metaphoric symbolization could change the whole psyche of an individual and how religion is viewed, I believe.
A mother is nurturing and is the first person you come in contact with once you are born and dependent on throughout your childhood. Why did religion kill the Goddess and what kind of world would this be if say somebody as a Christian started their prayer with "Our Mother" instead of "Our Father"?

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Security Management: DHS Taps Parking Lot Attendants

Kelly McCormack is adding this post.  I'm uploading it for her while she and I work out some technical glitches.  She notes that this article is interesting because most of the time you hear negative things regarding counter terrorism.  She would like to see further discussion of this.

On the lighter side...

I found this comic while doing some random searching online - it made me laugh, and made me think about the focus from this week's reading on the relationship between religion and violence. Obviously religion is a personal and highly valued issue to many people, but why is it that the world is so quick to turn to violence in defending religious values?

The Medical Profession and Torture

Should individuals in the medical profession engage in the practice of torture? Do their ethical responsibilities in the helping professions provide guidelines against participating in torture? This article speaks to a proposed legislation that would prohibit those in the health professions from engaging in any practice amounting to torture. Do you think that health and helping professionals should establish codes of conduct within their professions against engaging in the practice of torture? Can you think of any codes that exist thus far (e.g. American Psychological Association)?


A Kick at the U.S.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8669040.stm

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/05/19/terror-alert-as-barack-obama-plans-trip-to-watch-england-v-usa-world-cup-match-115875-22268585/

Fear of terrorism (and a little bit of U.S. bashing) reached a new height earlier this month...the 2010 FIFA World Cup, which kicks off next month. With 32 nations from around the globe set to descend on South Africa from June 11 to July 11, the host nation's police chief has one prayer...that the US team gets knocked out early. "Our famous prayer is that the Americans don't make the second round," said General Bheki Cele.

Though Cele insists that the South African police force could provide the requisite security to protect the expected 43 heads of state attending the football (I'm being internationally friendly here) matches, he is most-concerned apparently, with President Obama. Though the White House hasn't released whether the President will attend America's opening match against England, South Africa has planned one of it's largest security operations ever.

I wonder (and welcome comments and opinions on) whether General Cele's comment has more to do with security issues or whether it is a legitimate excuse for a personal opinion of the United States and it's standing in the world as of now.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Revoking the Citizenship of Potential Terrorists

Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) and Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) have taken the controversy over reading Faisal Shahzad his constitutional Miranda rights to the next level with their proposed amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Aside from the vague clause regarding "material support," to terrorist organizations, there must be a pause and a question of justice when the revocation of citizenship for a lawful U.S. citizen is considered.

Muslim Hero?

This article discusses Alioune B. Niass' efforts in helping to report the New York Times bomb. The key issue that the article raises is the fact that Mr. Niass, a Muslim, received little if any attention in helping to uncover the plot, because of what might be seen as Muslims playing a positive role in abating terrorism rather than partaking in it. What do you think about this story? Should Mr. Niass' efforts have been recognized? Should his identity as a Muslim be highlighted?

Friday, May 14, 2010

Irony in the War on Terror

As has been in the news seemingly everyday since it happened, on May 1st, a Pakistani-born American citizen drove an SUV with an IED (Improvised Explosive Device) into Times Square and attempted to detonate the car.

As this article from The Economist details, the NYPD has increased the number of detectives on its joint task-force with the FBI from 17 to 120, has hired a former senior CIA official to head its counter-terrorism branch, has posted detectives internationally, and has hired native speakers of Arabic, Dari, Persian, Urdu, Pushtun, and Bengali, all in an effort to keep the city as secure as possible. Additionally, according to the article, New York City has been the target of approximately 11 unsuccessful attacks since 2001, including attempts to demolish the Brooklyn Bridge and numerous attacks on Times Square, all which have been stopped.

Even with the billions of dollars spent on counter-terrorism in New York since 2001, on May 1st, the true counter-terrorist fighters were.............street vendors. While NYPD ultimately coordinated the evacuation of Times Square, it was the "I <3 NY" t-shirt, roasted nuts, and hotdog vendors, that first noticed the smoking car and reported it to authorities.

The article also mentions a disturbing trend that has taken place recently, with "home-grown" American citizens turning against the country that raised or welcomed them. From Faisal Shahzad, the Pakistani-born American citizen, to Najibullah Zazi, who was arrested for attempting to blowup a New York subway, to the Muslim army major who killed 12 people in Fort Hood, Texas, one-third of all those charged as terror suspects have been American citizens.

While the work NYPD has done since 2001 is commendable, this new home-grown trend makes the street vendors that line the sidewalks of New York just as important in the war on terror as the detectives and former CIA officials that work inside its buildings.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

"Jihadi Intent"

Last week, conservative columnist David Pipes seemingly coined a new phrase in the ongoing linguistic dispute over "terrorism," "man-made disasters," "Islamist," and others: he referred to the actions of the attempted Times Square bomber as having "jihadi intent."

While this is perhaps a slightly different take on the strict definition/usage of "terrorism," in that Pipes refers more directly to the motivations of the individual, it does beg the question of what precisely encompasses "jihadi intent," as opposed to simply "anti-U.S. sentiment," or simply various other "ideological/political sympathies." I am admittedly not entirely familiar with David Pipes (a friend forwarded me the article) but I am not sure the substitution of a new term into the terrorism debate will solve some of the issues Pipes is looking to address.

Monday, May 10, 2010

On the "Otherization" of Muslims

Read the attached article for Gerstein's discussion of otherization, "Islamist," and for an introduction to the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy. Does the definition of otherization used by the speaker Gerstein is describing, White House lawyer Rashad Hussein, help you understand otherization and the other? Do Gerstein's discussions of "Islamist" and the phrase, "violent extremism" in place of the term, "terrorism" help advance your understanding of Professor Akbar Ahmed's introduction to Islam in Islam Under Siege and of the uses of rhetoric in our grappling with terror?